We all know that you can't impose a "deal." This isn't post-World War Two, when the Allied Forces led by the United States defeated the Nazis and the Japanese and then imposed a "new order" on them.
Israel is a peaceful, vibrant, miraculously successful modern country which is being literally terrorized by Arabs, some rather recent to the area, a contradiction to the popular legends and lies being propagated. These terrorists are being backed and encouraged by foreign agitators, agent provocateurs, to do whatever they can to terrorize and destabilize the State of Israel.
No "deal," regardless how "creative" and "detailed" it may be can rectify the present situation.
Rumor is that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Bibi Netanyahu has been informed of the details of this "deal" and just requested that Trump tell his son-in-law to wait until after the upcoming Israeli elections. If this is true, it's bad news x2, times two or doubly bad. It looks like it's time to go into post-Bibi rule.
Is there anyone in Likud who will be better for the security and sovereignty of the State of Israel? Bibi's successor also must be capable of negotiating a ruling coalition, or we'll find ourselves suffering through continuous successful elections.
To pull Netanyahu in the Right direction, we need a strong showing for the New Right, the Naftali Bennett, Ayelet Shaked and Caroline Glick party.
The State of Israel needs leaders, not followers. We need a government that has no problem telling Kushner and Trump what they should do with their "deal."
7 comments:
agreed. hopefully many more people will think like you and elect a strong yemin hachadash
Thanks, Gd willing.
It would be helpful to know what is dumb and dangerous about Kushner’s deal.
Start with everything.
1-The mistaken idea that one can make a "deal" with unrepentant terrorists.
2-The mistaken idea that the Arab terrorists actually want a state and all the responsibilities it would entail.
3-The mistaken idea that the Arab terrorists would be willing and able to give up its main goal which is the total destruction of the State of Israel.
No offense, but how dumb can you get by asking your question.
Your comment is offensive.
Your post did not explain o your rationale for your position. Guess you feel no need for such formalities.
I explained it very simply. You can't have peace with someone who wants to destroy you, and it doesn't matter who comes up with a "solution" it can't bring peace, will only make things worse for us.
I explained it very simply. You can't have peace with someone who wants to destroy you...
That would be an arguable position, but you did not make that point in this article. This blog post amounted to a petulant outburst toward Kushner and the plan he put forward while offering no reasoned criticism of it. Then, when challenged, you tried to recover by insulting your critic and adding an additional argument about "you can't make peace with ..." that was not found in your original statement.
I have appreciated some of your writing, but I find your snotty comments toward Kushner and me to be off-putting to the extent I can no longer consider you to be a serious observer of the complex geopolitical challenge Israel faces. Good luck to you.
Post a Comment